Positive lists: a demand or a request?

Share
Share

WAKEFIELD – The growing use of positive lists is tackled in the next printed issue of Ecotextile News. In an in-depth look at the potential scale and use of positive lists, our textile chemicals correspondent Phil Patterson asks whether a positive list should apply to a handful of selected chemicals or all chemicals used in manufacture. “A typical restricted substances list (RSL) or a piece of chemical legislation is normally based around what you can’t do – it’s seen as being negative,” says Patterson. “We understand that suppliers to major brands are now saying that they’d like to be told is what they can do rather than what they can’t do – and, faced with some of the mixed messages the global legislators are giving, it seems a fairly reasonable request.”

Patterson asks: “Should a positive list be a demand to use a specific product from a specific chemical supplier or a general piece of advice to use a particular chemical type? Should a positive list be a recommendation or mandate to use components that have been independently certified as meeting a raft of negative standards? Or should a positive list be a gentle nudge towards best practice?“

WAKEFIELD – The growing use of positive lists is tackled in the next printed issue of Ecotextile News. In an in-depth look at the potential scale and use of positive lists, our textile chemicals correspondent Phil Patterson asks whether a positive list should apply to a handful of selected chemicals or all chemicals used in manufacture. “A typical restricted substances list (RSL) or a piece of chemical legislation is normally based around what you can’t do – it’s seen as being negative,” says Patterson. “We understand that suppliers to major brands are now saying that they’d like to be told is what they can do rather than what they can’t do – and, faced with some of the mixed messages the global legislators are giving, it seems a fairly reasonable request.”

Patterson asks: “Should a positive list be a demand to use a specific product from a specific chemical supplier or a general piece of advice to use a particular chemical type? Should a positive list be a recommendation or mandate to use components that have been independently certified as meeting a raft of negative standards? Or should a positive list be a gentle nudge towards best practice?“

Newsletter

Read our top news stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Share

Recommended

Latest Magazine

Features
Why China’s new wastewater standard is only one part of a broader shift spanning environmental law
As Brussels switches on its product passport registry, fashion’s supply chain data gaps threaten a bumpy rollout
As green claims face closer regulatory scrutiny liability no longer sits solely with the brands
News
Preview of our Textile Standards & Legislation Guide
China’s strengthened rules make officials personally accountable for serious environmental damage
New process to strip reactive dyes from cotton could benefit textile-to-textile recycling
Opinion
European factory closures show costs, geography and demand decide which materials survive

Other publications from MCL News & Media

Scroll to Top
Logo

Our free newsletter showcases the very best of our journalism, delivered to you twice a week

Advertising
With Us

Help to support the purpose-led work of our team of journalists, international correspondents, and partners – and expose your product or service to our global readership.

Subscribe to our magazine today and receive exclusive online content

Subscribe