Is a chemically compliant Brexit Britain out of REACH?

Share
Share

BRUSSELS – To coincide with the latest round of Brexit talks, Cefic, CHEM Trust, the European Environment Bureau (EEB) and the UK Chemical Industries Association (CIA) have used an open letter to all EU Heads of State to call for the UK to remain within REACH once the nation’s exit from the European Union is complete.

The industry bodies have urged the 27 EU member state governments to maintain the “high standards of protection of citizens and environment, and ensure business continuity for companies” by allowing the UK to remain within – and, crucially, bound by – REACH regulations and grant its continued participation in the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

The letter asserts, “a strong REACH is in everybody’s interest.” A statement which will undoubtedly divide the textile sector, with many individuals and companies sceptical as to whether the initiative, no matter how well-intentioned, has in fact led to more damage being caused than it has averted.

An alignment of chemical management will, however, almost certainly be viewed as a sensible way to navigate the UK’s split from the EU; with the duplication of effort and division of valuable cross-channel scientific bonds benefitting no one.

Chemical management, like so many issues, remain in the balance as Brexit negotiations continue

BRUSSELS – To coincide with the latest round of Brexit talks, Cefic, CHEM Trust, the European Environment Bureau (EEB) and the UK Chemical Industries Association (CIA) have used an open letter to all EU Heads of State to call for the UK to remain within REACH once the nation’s exit from the European Union is complete.

The industry bodies have urged the 27 EU member state governments to maintain the “high standards of protection of citizens and environment, and ensure business continuity for companies” by allowing the UK to remain within – and, crucially, bound by – REACH regulations and grant its continued participation in the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).

The letter asserts, “a strong REACH is in everybody’s interest.” A statement which will undoubtedly divide the textile sector, with many individuals and companies sceptical as to whether the initiative, no matter how well-intentioned, has in fact led to more damage being caused than it has averted.

An alignment of chemical management will, however, almost certainly be viewed as a sensible way to navigate the UK’s split from the EU; with the duplication of effort and division of valuable cross-channel scientific bonds benefitting no one.

Newsletter

Read our top news stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Share

Recommended

Latest Magazine

Features
Why China’s new wastewater standard is only one part of a broader shift spanning environmental law
As Brussels switches on its product passport registry, fashion’s supply chain data gaps threaten a bumpy rollout
As green claims face closer regulatory scrutiny liability no longer sits solely with the brands
News
Preview of our Textile Standards & Legislation Guide
China’s strengthened rules make officials personally accountable for serious environmental damage
New process to strip reactive dyes from cotton could benefit textile-to-textile recycling
Opinion
European factory closures show costs, geography and demand decide which materials survive

Other publications from MCL News & Media

Scroll to Top
Logo

Our free newsletter showcases the very best of our journalism, delivered to you twice a week

Advertising
With Us

Help to support the purpose-led work of our team of journalists, international correspondents, and partners – and expose your product or service to our global readership.

Subscribe to our magazine today and receive exclusive online content

Subscribe