NGOs question value of EU PEF tool

Share
Share

BRUSSELS – A group of non-profit organisations including Fashion Revolution, Clean Clothes Campaign and the Fair Trade Advocacy Office have raised concerns about the EU’s impending Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEF-CR), suggesting they provide only a “limited and ‘unholistic’ picture of product impact”.  

In an open letter to European legislators, the NGOs called into question the credibility of lifecycle assessment (LCA) data, the Higg Materials Sustainability Index, the lack of diversity of representation in the tool’s development and its inability to account for social aspects, such as factory conditions and wages, saying the PEF should “not be used as the standalone method” behind textile product labelling for substantiating green claims.  

In response to the critics, Andrew Martin, vice president of membership and stakeholder engagement at the Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC), which develops Higg Index methodology, told Ecotextile News: “The PEF was never meant … to capture elements such as social and labour impacts”, and called upon the European Commission “to be unflinching in its commitment to the PEF”, which has been nearly a decade in development already.  

BRUSSELS – A group of non-profit organisations including Fashion Revolution, Clean Clothes Campaign and the Fair Trade Advocacy Office have raised concerns about the EU’s impending Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEF-CR), suggesting they provide only a “limited and ‘unholistic’ picture of product impact”.  

In an open letter to European legislators, the NGOs called into question the credibility of lifecycle assessment (LCA) data, the Higg Materials Sustainability Index, the lack of diversity of representation in the tool’s development and its inability to account for social aspects, such as factory conditions and wages, saying the PEF should “not be used as the standalone method” behind textile product labelling for substantiating green claims.  

In response to the critics, Andrew Martin, vice president of membership and stakeholder engagement at the Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC), which develops Higg Index methodology, told Ecotextile News: “The PEF was never meant … to capture elements such as social and labour impacts”, and called upon the European Commission “to be unflinching in its commitment to the PEF”, which has been nearly a decade in development already.  

Newsletter

Read our top news stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Share

Recommended

Latest Magazine

Features
Why China’s new wastewater standard is only one part of a broader shift spanning environmental law
As Brussels switches on its product passport registry, fashion’s supply chain data gaps threaten a bumpy rollout
As green claims face closer regulatory scrutiny liability no longer sits solely with the brands
News
Preview of our Textile Standards & Legislation Guide
China’s strengthened rules make officials personally accountable for serious environmental damage
New process to strip reactive dyes from cotton could benefit textile-to-textile recycling
Opinion
European factory closures show costs, geography and demand decide which materials survive

Other publications from MCL News & Media

Scroll to Top
Logo

Our free newsletter showcases the very best of our journalism, delivered to you twice a week

Advertising
With Us

Help to support the purpose-led work of our team of journalists, international correspondents, and partners – and expose your product or service to our global readership.

Subscribe to our magazine today and receive exclusive online content

Subscribe