Brands ‘supportive of EU PFAS restrictions’

Share
Share

BRUSSELS – Safer chemicals NGO ChemSec says it has consulted with 53 leading brands on the proposed European Union (EU) ban on the use of PFAS chemicals and that all are in favour of restrictions.

The EU proposals – which look set to be delayed beyond the target date of 2025 – would ban the use and production of the entire group of PFAS to avoid one being replaced with another in what ChemSec terms “regrettable substitution”.

Dubbed “forever chemicals” for their durability in the environment, PFAS are widely used as a waterproof coating on textiles – and also for non-stick pans and firefighting equipment – and have been linked with major health issues including liver damage, thyroid disease and cancer.

BRUSSELS – Safer chemicals NGO ChemSec says it has consulted with 53 leading brands on the proposed European Union (EU) ban on the use of PFAS chemicals and that all are in favour of restrictions.

The EU proposals – which look set to be delayed beyond the target date of 2025 – would ban the use and production of the entire group of PFAS to avoid one being replaced with another in what ChemSec terms “regrettable substitution”.

Dubbed “forever chemicals” for their durability in the environment, PFAS are widely used as a waterproof coating on textiles – and also for non-stick pans and firefighting equipment – and have been linked with major health issues including liver damage, thyroid disease and cancer.

Newsletter

Read our top news stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Share

Recommended

Latest Magazine

Features
Why China’s new wastewater standard is only one part of a broader shift spanning environmental law
As Brussels switches on its product passport registry, fashion’s supply chain data gaps threaten a bumpy rollout
As green claims face closer regulatory scrutiny liability no longer sits solely with the brands
News
Preview of our Textile Standards & Legislation Guide
China’s strengthened rules make officials personally accountable for serious environmental damage
New process to strip reactive dyes from cotton could benefit textile-to-textile recycling
Opinion
European factory closures show costs, geography and demand decide which materials survive

Other publications from MCL News & Media

Scroll to Top
Logo

Our free newsletter showcases the very best of our journalism, delivered to you twice a week

Advertising
With Us

Help to support the purpose-led work of our team of journalists, international correspondents, and partners – and expose your product or service to our global readership.

Subscribe to our magazine today and receive exclusive online content

Subscribe