TTIP: a threat to EU chemicals regulation?

Share
Share

LONDON – The UK government has published a new report addressing fears that the proposed Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) could pose a serious threat to environmental regulations in the EU – including laws governing potentially toxic chemicals used in the textile industry. Many NGOs have expressed concern that attempts to harmonise environmental regulations between the EU and US as part of the TTIP will lead to a ‘race to the bottom’ on environmental regulations, with the EU’s stronger focus on applying the precautionary principle in setting regulations being superseded by a US-style focus on a ‘cost benefit analysis’ assessment of proposed new regulations.

The report by the UK government’s Environmental Audit Committee argues that, “the EU’s stronger focus on applying the precautionary principle in setting regulations should not be weakened as a result of efforts under TTIP to align the regulatory standards of the EU and US.” It adds: “Where ‘mutual recognition’ of environmental standards is used to smooth trade between the EU and US, this must be applied only in cases where the regulations are genuinely already providing ‘equivalent’ safeguards. Failing to keep to such a course risks an unacceptable ‘race to the bottom’ in environmental regulations.”

Chemicals

LONDON – The UK government has published a new report addressing fears that the proposed Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) could pose a serious threat to environmental regulations in the EU – including laws governing potentially toxic chemicals used in the textile industry. Many NGOs have expressed concern that attempts to harmonise environmental regulations between the EU and US as part of the TTIP will lead to a ‘race to the bottom’ on environmental regulations, with the EU’s stronger focus on applying the precautionary principle in setting regulations being superseded by a US-style focus on a ‘cost benefit analysis’ assessment of proposed new regulations.

The report by the UK government’s Environmental Audit Committee argues that, “the EU’s stronger focus on applying the precautionary principle in setting regulations should not be weakened as a result of efforts under TTIP to align the regulatory standards of the EU and US.” It adds: “Where ‘mutual recognition’ of environmental standards is used to smooth trade between the EU and US, this must be applied only in cases where the regulations are genuinely already providing ‘equivalent’ safeguards. Failing to keep to such a course risks an unacceptable ‘race to the bottom’ in environmental regulations.”

Newsletter

Read our top news stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Share

Recommended

Latest Magazine

Features
Why China’s new wastewater standard is only one part of a broader shift spanning environmental law
As Brussels switches on its product passport registry, fashion’s supply chain data gaps threaten a bumpy rollout
As green claims face closer regulatory scrutiny liability no longer sits solely with the brands
News
Preview of our Textile Standards & Legislation Guide
China’s strengthened rules make officials personally accountable for serious environmental damage
New process to strip reactive dyes from cotton could benefit textile-to-textile recycling
Opinion
European factory closures show costs, geography and demand decide which materials survive

Other publications from MCL News & Media

Scroll to Top
Logo

Our free newsletter showcases the very best of our journalism, delivered to you twice a week

Advertising
With Us

Help to support the purpose-led work of our team of journalists, international correspondents, and partners – and expose your product or service to our global readership.

Subscribe to our magazine today and receive exclusive online content

Subscribe