Podcast: Sweden’s textile chemical tax – part 2

Share
Share

WAKEFIELD – In the second part of our look at the Swedish government’s proposed tax on chemicals in textiles, we talk to some of those in support of the project.

Three experts join our host, Michael Schragger, founder of the Sustainable Fashion Academy, to discuss whether the proposal will lead to a reduction in harmful chemicals in Sweden and globally.

They are Therese Jacobsson, head of ocean, water and toxics at the Swedish Society of Nature Conservation; Daniel Slunge, an environmental economist at the Gothenburg Centre for Sustainable Development and the FRAM Centre for Future chemical Risk Assessment and Management; and Åke Bergman, a professor at Stockholm University.

You can listen to the full, uninterrupted podcast HERE.

The proposed new legislation in Sweden, set to come into force from 2022, would tax clothing and footwear manufacturers which use any of 151 pre-defined harmful substances in their products.

It would mean that companies based in the country would be forced to pay a tax on garments and footwear unless they can prove that they do not contain these substances.

Swedish companies have complained that the proposals would make them uncompetitive with overseas rivals, and would force them to carry out costly tests to prove their products are free of chemicals which many say they know are not used in their production.

However, Jacobsson welcomed the proposals, outlined in an inquiry report entitled ‘Tax on fashion – to remove harmful chemicals’, which she said would make Sweden a global leader in the removal of harmful chemicals from apparel.

“We are very positive that the inquiry is suggesting a tax that actually moves us forward when it comes to phasing out hazardous chemicals and towards a non-toxic environment that we all want,” she said.

Slunge said the tax followed the principle of “the polluter pays”, but he agreed that the costs for industry could be a real problem, particularly for smaller companies.

“We’d like to be much more precise in taxing the problem, that would be ideal, but one of the big challenges is that we don’t have information of what is in these products,” he explained. “Producers and retailers don’t seem to have this information.”

Bergman agreed, adding that supply chain transparency was key: “This is the big problem. The argument from industry is that they don’t have this information. Unless we know what is going into these materials and goods, we will never do anything but rely on serendipity,” he said.

You can listen to the full podcast HERE.

 

 

Share

Recommended

Latest Magazine

Features
Why the EU’s regulatory push for longer-lasting clothes could enrich the wrong industry.
Textile dye recovery is technically real, but experts warn that it risks becoming a costly sideshow.
When profits wobble, fashion brands default on climate, pushing self-issued net-zero targets over the horizon.
News
A new evidence-based review challenges assumptions over organic cotton’s growth.
EU anti-fraud investigators help block the illegal export and dumping of thousands of tonnes of textiles.
SBTi’s new net-zero standard tightens rules on fashion’s climate claims
Opinion
Exclusive: Uzbek cotton cluster boss hails big reforms as human rights campaigners claim exploitation

Other publications from MCL News & Media

Scroll to Top
Logo

Our free newsletter showcases the very best of our journalism, delivered to you twice a week

Advertising
With Us

Help to support the purpose-led work of our team of journalists, international correspondents, and partners – and expose your product or service to our global readership.

Subscribe to our magazine today and receive exclusive online content

Subscribe