New report blasts textile certification

Share
Share

LONDON – A new NGO report published today concludes that environmental certification programmes in the textile sector are guilty of making false promises on sustainability and calls for the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) to be scrapped completely.

The report notes that many shoppers rely on labels and certifications for an easily-understandable way to determine how responsibly a garment is manufactured, and it lambasts certain initiatives for a lack of transparency, criticises the Higg Index for its self-assessment approach and accuses MADE-BY of being incomplete.

“Many schemes lack transparency”, says the report, “and are being used as a cover – making it more difficult for NGOs and academics to question the sustainability of some products and companies.”

On a positive note, the report flags up the EU Eco-Label and the Global Organic Textile Standard as being among the “best schemes, because they use a life-cycle approach to textile certification.”

Published by Changing Markets, the new report also looks at certification in the palm oil and fisheries sectors, although its overall findings look somewhat confused in that some of the textile initiatives under fire are not in themselves consumer-facing labels – although the NGO denies this.

Meanwhile, BCI, the Sustainable Apparel Coalition and MADE-BY have all rebuffed the report.

LONDON – A new NGO report published today concludes that environmental certification programmes in the textile sector are guilty of making false promises on sustainability and calls for the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) to be scrapped completely.

The report notes that many shoppers rely on labels and certifications for an easily-understandable way to determine how responsibly a garment is manufactured, and it lambasts certain initiatives for a lack of transparency, criticises the Higg Index for its self-assessment approach and accuses MADE-BY of being incomplete.

“Many schemes lack transparency”, says the report, “and are being used as a cover – making it more difficult for NGOs and academics to question the sustainability of some products and companies.”

On a positive note, the report flags up the EU Eco-Label and the Global Organic Textile Standard as being among the “best schemes, because they use a life-cycle approach to textile certification.”

Published by Changing Markets, the new report also looks at certification in the palm oil and fisheries sectors, although its overall findings look somewhat confused in that some of the textile initiatives under fire are not in themselves consumer-facing labels – although the NGO denies this.

Meanwhile, BCI, the Sustainable Apparel Coalition and MADE-BY have all rebuffed the report.

Newsletter

Read our top news stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Share

Recommended

Latest Magazine

Features
Why China’s new wastewater standard is only one part of a broader shift spanning environmental law
As Brussels switches on its product passport registry, fashion’s supply chain data gaps threaten a bumpy rollout
As green claims face closer regulatory scrutiny liability no longer sits solely with the brands
News
Preview of our Textile Standards & Legislation Guide
China’s strengthened rules make officials personally accountable for serious environmental damage
New process to strip reactive dyes from cotton could benefit textile-to-textile recycling
Opinion
European factory closures show costs, geography and demand decide which materials survive

Other publications from MCL News & Media

Scroll to Top
Logo

Our free newsletter showcases the very best of our journalism, delivered to you twice a week

Advertising
With Us

Help to support the purpose-led work of our team of journalists, international correspondents, and partners – and expose your product or service to our global readership.

Subscribe to our magazine today and receive exclusive online content

Subscribe