BRUSSELS – Human Rights Watch has published a new report in which it says that audits and certifications for suppliers in industries including fashion aren’t sufficient in measuring social and environmental due diligence.
The organisation points to a “conflict of interest” between auditing firms and their paying clients – which are typically brands and retailers – which can “cloud the social auditing process”.
“Companies should not rely on social audits and certifications to prove adherence to human rights standards in their own operations or global supply chains. Policymakers and regulators should not exempt companies from administrative penalties or civil liability because they have used auditing or certification programmes,” said Aruna Kashyap, Human Rights Watch’s associate economic justice and rights director.
Already have an account? Log In
Recommended
Most Popular
Latest Magazine
Features
Why China’s new wastewater standard is only one part of a broader shift spanning environmental law
As Brussels switches on its product passport registry, fashion’s supply chain data gaps threaten a bumpy rollout
As green claims face closer regulatory scrutiny liability no longer sits solely with the brands
News
Preview of our Textile Standards & Legislation Guide
China’s strengthened rules make officials personally accountable for serious environmental damage
New process to strip reactive dyes from cotton could benefit textile-to-textile recycling
Opinion
European factory closures show costs, geography and demand decide which materials survive
Other publications from MCL News & Media
