H&M called out on “illegal” sustainability marketing

Share
Share

OSLO – The Norwegian Consumer Authority (CA), an independent administrative body which works to influence trading decisions across an array of markets, has lambasted what it calls “illegal marketing” from H&M in the promotion of its Conscious collection, and has demanded the fashion brand apologise to consumers.

In particular, the CA, in close collaboration with the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK), claims H&M’s portrayal of its collection’s sustainability credentials breaches Norwegian marketing laws and alleges that the brand uses symbols, statements and colour to mislead buyers.

H&M launched its Conscious line in April, an ensemble it describes as a “collection inspired by the wonders of planet earth”, through which it has introduced three new renewable resources: citrus peel, pineapple leaves and algae biomass.

The fashion brand has defended itself speaking exclusively with Ecotextile News, saying the CA “doesn’t have the background or competence to evaluate [the apparel collection],” and has instead chosen to challenge the precision of the information it provides.

OSLO – The Norwegian Consumer Authority (CA), an independent administrative body which works to influence trading decisions across an array of markets, has lambasted what it calls “illegal marketing” from H&M in the promotion of its Conscious collection, and has demanded the fashion brand apologise to consumers.

In particular, the CA, in close collaboration with the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK), claims H&M’s portrayal of its collection’s sustainability credentials breaches Norwegian marketing laws and alleges that the brand uses symbols, statements and colour to mislead buyers.

H&M launched its Conscious line in April, an ensemble it describes as a “collection inspired by the wonders of planet earth”, through which it has introduced three new renewable resources: citrus peel, pineapple leaves and algae biomass.

The fashion brand has defended itself speaking exclusively with Ecotextile News, saying the CA “doesn’t have the background or competence to evaluate [the apparel collection],” and has instead chosen to challenge the precision of the information it provides.

Share

Recommended

Latest Magazine

Features
Why the EU’s regulatory push for longer-lasting clothes could enrich the wrong industry.
Textile dye recovery is technically real, but experts warn that it risks becoming a costly sideshow.
When profits wobble, fashion brands default on climate, pushing self-issued net-zero targets over the horizon.
News
A new evidence-based review challenges assumptions over organic cotton’s growth.
EU anti-fraud investigators help block the illegal export and dumping of thousands of tonnes of textiles.
SBTi’s new net-zero standard tightens rules on fashion’s climate claims
Opinion
Exclusive: Uzbek cotton cluster boss hails big reforms as human rights campaigners claim exploitation

Other publications from MCL News & Media

Scroll to Top
Logo

Our free newsletter showcases the very best of our journalism, delivered to you twice a week

Advertising
With Us

Help to support the purpose-led work of our team of journalists, international correspondents, and partners – and expose your product or service to our global readership.

Subscribe to our magazine today and receive exclusive online content

Subscribe