China law puts fashion brands in compliance bind

Share
Share
Chinese textile factory owner conducting and audit
The Decree prohibits organisations from conducting supply chain-related investigations or information collection activities.

BEIJING – A new Chinese law that recently came into force with no transition period is creating an unprecedented compliance dilemma for fashion brands: the activities now legally required under Western supply chain legislation may simultaneously constitute a violation of Chinese national security law.

The conflict with Western legislation is direct. Conducting ESG, forced labour, or supply chain audits in China to comply with the EU CSDDD or US UFLPA directly conflicts with Decree 834 – and for fashion brands, the stakes are particularly high.

Newsletter

Read our top news stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Share

Recommended

Latest Magazine

Features
Why China’s new wastewater standard is only one part of a broader shift spanning environmental law
As Brussels switches on its product passport registry, fashion’s supply chain data gaps threaten a bumpy rollout
As green claims face closer regulatory scrutiny liability no longer sits solely with the brands
News
Preview of our Textile Standards & Legislation Guide
China’s strengthened rules make officials personally accountable for serious environmental damage
New process to strip reactive dyes from cotton could benefit textile-to-textile recycling
Opinion
European factory closures show costs, geography and demand decide which materials survive

Other publications from MCL News & Media

Scroll to Top
Logo

Our free newsletter showcases the very best of our journalism, delivered to you twice a week

Advertising
With Us

Help to support the purpose-led work of our team of journalists, international correspondents, and partners – and expose your product or service to our global readership.

Subscribe to our magazine today and receive exclusive online content

Subscribe