China law puts fashion brands in compliance bind

Share
Share
Chinese textile factory owner conducting and audit
The Decree prohibits organisations from conducting supply chain-related investigations or information collection activities.

BEIJING – A new Chinese law that recently came into force with no transition period is creating an unprecedented compliance dilemma for fashion brands: the activities now legally required under Western supply chain legislation may simultaneously constitute a violation of Chinese national security law.

The conflict with Western legislation is direct. Conducting ESG, forced labour, or supply chain audits in China to comply with the EU CSDDD or US UFLPA directly conflicts with Decree 834 – and for fashion brands, the stakes are particularly high.

Share

Recommended

Latest Magazine

Features
Why the EU’s regulatory push for longer-lasting clothes could enrich the wrong industry.
Textile dye recovery is technically real, but experts warn that it risks becoming a costly sideshow.
When profits wobble, fashion brands default on climate, pushing self-issued net-zero targets over the horizon.
News
A new evidence-based review challenges assumptions over organic cotton’s growth.
EU anti-fraud investigators help block the illegal export and dumping of thousands of tonnes of textiles.
SBTi’s new net-zero standard tightens rules on fashion’s climate claims
Opinion
Exclusive: Uzbek cotton cluster boss hails big reforms as human rights campaigners claim exploitation

Other publications from MCL News & Media

Scroll to Top
Logo

Our free newsletter showcases the very best of our journalism, delivered to you twice a week

Advertising
With Us

Help to support the purpose-led work of our team of journalists, international correspondents, and partners – and expose your product or service to our global readership.

Subscribe to our magazine today and receive exclusive online content

Subscribe